Course & Instructor Information

Sections: WRT 100A: MWF 10:10 a.m.-11:05 a.m. || WRT 100C (Honors): MWF 11:15 a.m. -12:10 p.m. || WRT 100E:  MWF 12:20-1:15 p.m. || WRT 100G: MWF 1:25 p.m.-2:20 p.m. || Dunleavy 204 

Instructor: Dr. Erin Karper  || Emailekarper@niagara.edu or ProfKarper@gmail.com || AIM: ProfKarper ||  Office: Dunleavy 350 || Phone:  286-8631 || Office Hours: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays 9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. and 2:30-3:30 p.m.; other times by appointment 

Download Regular Syllabus (PDF File) || Download Honors Syllabus (PDF File)

Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for November 16-20

Monday, November 16
Today you’ll exchange annotated bibliographies and work on conducting peer review.

Assignments for Next Class
Complete peer review sheets and bring them to class.

Wednesday, November 18
Today you’ll exchange comments in your peer review groups and we’ll do some revision activities focused on style and citations.

Assignments for Next Class
Attend optional conference on Thursday or Friday.
Work on final draft of annotated bibliography.

Friday, November 20
NO CLASS: ATTEND OPTIONAL CONFERENCE ON THURSDAY OR FRIDAY.

Assignments for Next Class
FINAL DRAFT OF ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23.

Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for October 26-30

Monday, October 26

Today we’ll discuss choosing and refining a topic and creating a research question, and then we’ll examine making appropriate word choices to match specific rhetorical situations.

Assignments for Next Class

Email research questions to instructor
Read pp. 384-399 in Norton Guide.

Wednesday, October 28

Today we’ll discuss the different types of sources available for academic writing.

Assignments for Next Class

Read pp. 400-403 in Norton Guide.

Friday, October 30

Today we’ll look for answers to the questions of “What does it mean to take a position? What is your position?” by examining a sample source and your arguments.

Assignments for Next Class

Read pp 99-110 in Norton Guide
Read “A Modest Proposal” (given out in class)

Printable Version Printable Version

Investigating Your Field: Assignment Guidelines

Download Printer-Friendly Version

Jump to: Topic || Research || Annotated Bibliography || Position Paper

What’s this project about?

You are in the process of committing a number of years of your life to learning about a particular discipline, such as Elementary Education, Accounting, Sports Management, Physics, History, or Biology. You may also have specific career plans for when you leave Niagara.For this project, you will investigate, analyze and argue about a topic related to your major or future career which focuses on these questions:

  • How do people make knowledge in your field of study or in your career?
  • What happens when experts disagree? When and why do they disagree?
  • How do you sort through all of the evidence surrounding a controversial question or idea and decide what your position is?
  • How do you create a solid argument by using rhetorical appeals?
  • How do you respond to counter-arguments?

This assignment asks you to identify a controversial issue in your field, research multiple perspectives on this issue, and to decide which perspectives you agree and disagree with.You’ll write an annotated bibliography (10 entries) and an position essay (8-10 pages) aimed at people outside of your field.

You will be expected to work both individually and in-groups to complete these assignments, as well as to complete multiple drafts and to show significant evidence of revision on the final versions. You will also be expected to pay attention to deadlines and to check the course Web site and the weekly agendas for the most current information about assignments, deadlines, and other vital information.

You may not “recycle” a paper or an annotated bibliography that you have written for another class for this assignment. If you wish to work on the same topic that you are pursuing in another class, that may be acceptable; please talk to both instructors and obtain their permission before you do so.

You can earn a total of 450 points for all of the assignments in this unit plus points for peer review activities; the amount of points for each component are available next to each component, as well as explained on each assignment sheet and on the course syllabus. Grading rubrics will be distributed with the final version of each project.

The Writing Center, in the Seton Presidential Lounge, offers free tutoring in writing; you are encouraged to visit them for additional help with your writing. You can make an appointment to see a tutor by calling 286-8075.

Choose A Topic and Form A Research Question

First, you’ll choose a topic and form a research question that you can use to help guide your research. Your topic should:

  • Be related to your major or career OR to a major or career that you want to explore.
  • Be about an issue in your field of study that has multiple perspectives or some controversy attached to it.
  • Be a topic on which you can locate academic, trade, and popular sources.

The topic cannot be a “generic issue” such as abortion, gun control, the death penalty, stem cell research, lowering the drinking age, legalizing drugs, or other common social issues, unless you can show exactly how these controversies are dealt with in your academic field. IT MUST BE A TOPIC ABOUT WHICH THERE IS DISAGREEMENT: YOU ARE WRITING A POSITION PAPER, NOT AN INFORMATIVE PAPER. Your topic should be as specific as possible, and you should be able to articulate clear research questions about it to help you look for sources and develop a thesis.Here are some possible topics that would fit the assignment guidelines:

  • Should elementary school students be taught how to use computers, or does teaching computer skills at a young age actually hinder their learning? (Education)
  • What are the best strategies for dealing with prison overcrowding? (Criminal Justice)
  • Does building a casino in an area cause economic harm, or does it benefit the area? (Tourism Management)
  • Are electronic voting machines or paper ballots a better practice for elections in the United States? (Political Science)
  • Is outsourcing information technology jobs a positive or negative practice for businesses in the united states? (Business)
  • What are the best therapies for treating breast cancer? (Medicine)
  • Do cognitive behavior therapy or anti-depressants work better in treating depression? (Psychology/Medicine)
  • What really happened to the lost colonists of Roanoke Island? (History)

On October 23 and October 26, we’ll work on choosing topics and forming research questions. By October 28, you should e-mail the instructor (ekarper@niagara.edu) with a description of your chosen topic and your research question.
If after you have started researching, you discover that you need to change your topic because you cannot find sources, you must notify the instructor by e-mail or in person as soon as possible.

Conduct Research in the Library and Online

After you choose a topic and formulate a research question, we’ll discuss the creation of academic knowledge and how arguments work. After that, you will conduct research in the library and online on November 9 and November 11. During your research, you should locate at least ten (10) sources.To encourage you to seek out a variety of sources and to practice working with different types of sources, I’m going to ask you to choose sources from different categories – you’ll notice that each category has sources in it that come from both print and the Web.At least six (6) of your sources should be from the following categories:

  • Books or essay collections
  • Academic journal articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Trade journal articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Academic, educational, or professional Web resources

Four (4) of your sources can come from the following categories:

  • Interviews with experts in your field
  • Popular newspaper or magazine articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Commercial Web sites
  • Specialized resources from your field, such as encyclopedias
  • Other sources (please check with the instructor)

You can use encyclopedias such as Wikipedia or textbooks from your major courses as a reference for identifying controversial questions and perspectives, but you cannot use them as sources in the assignment because they do not provide enough depth and breadth. However, you can look up and use the references they cite as part of your research.Make sure that you give yourself enough time to locate sources. Also make sure that you consult with the instructor or with a librarian if you are having trouble locating ten sources.

Write an Annotated Bibliography

After you have located research on your topic, you will write an annotated bibliography where you annotate at least ten (10) sources and summarize, assess, and reflect on each source.To complete the assignment, you should:

  • Write ONE introductory paragraph for the annotated bibliography that presents your research question and explains what you’ve discovered in your research. (You do not need to write an introductory paragraph for each citation.)
  • Create a citation for each source as if you were going to cite it in a works cited list. Alphabetize your citations (and their annotations) as if they were in a works cited list.
  • Under each citation, write two paragraphs for each source where you:
    • Summarize the source’s content: What are the main points being conveyed?
    • Assess the source’s credibility and importance: Why is this a reasonable and useful source for your project?
    • Reflect on why this is a relevant source for your project: Why is it important that you use this information in your project instead of some other source? (You can talk about how this isn’t a good source for your project if you don’t think it will be useful.)
  • If you quote directly from any source in your annotation, attribute the quotations using MLA style conventions.
  • Write with care and attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

You only have to write two paragraphs for each source; however, you must make sure that you summarize, assess, and reflect on the source in each annotation. See the sample annotated bibliography in the printer-friendly version for an example of what the project should look like.

Grading Criteria This project will be graded on the following criteria:

  • How well you use MLA style to create a citation for each source.
  • How well you summarize, assess, and reflect on each source.
  • How well you use appropriate conventions for written English (grammar, spelling, punctuation, style and tone).

The first draft of the annotated bibliography is due on November 15; The final draft is due on November 20. You can earn a maximum of 200 points for the annotated bibliography.

Write A Position Paper

You’ll use the sources that you’ve collected and presented in your annotated bibliography to help you write a long academic essay where you take a position on the issue and use your research and your own ideas and opinions to explain and argue for your position.Specifics In the essay, you should:

  • Describe the issue you have chosen to research.
  • Describe the different positions which people in your field have on this topic using research and your own knowledge.
  • Provide a clear and explicit thesis statement which explains your position and your reasons why this position is the best choice.
  • Develop an argument for your position with reasons and evidence from outside sources as well as your own opinions.
  • Use at least ten (10) sources of information in your paper. These sources should include some of the sources from your annotated bibliography.
  • Connect your ideas using transition words and phrases.
  • Write in an academic style. (You can use first person, but your language should be precise, concise, and more formal than other types of writing.)
  • Create sentences that are precise, concise, and correct.
  • Show evidence of revision in your final draft.
  • Pay attention to English conventions for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Formatting

The essay should:

  • Have a heading on the first page with your name, your section, and the date. (A title page is not necessary.)
  • Have a title that is centered on the first page under the heading.
  • Contain page numbers on all pages but the first.
  • Be 8-10 pages long (double-spaced; twelve-point font), including your works cited list.
  • Use MLA style to give credit to sources by providing in-text citations, attributive tags, and a works cited list.

We’ll work together in class to help you develop all parts of your paper. You’ll also have an opportunity to give and receive feedback with your classmates on your first draft, as well as receiving comments from the instructor.The first draft of the essay is due on November 30; the final draft of the essay is due on December 11. Grading CriteriaThis paper will be graded based on how well it:

  • Describes the issue and explains the different perspectives.
  • Takes a clear position and justifies the this position.
  • Presents a specific thesis statement with a claim and reasons and has a clear focus.
  • Presents and incorporates information, including using the works of others and the opinions and experience of the writer.
  • Includes the minimum of ten sources.
  • Organizes and presents information, including making transitions and connections between ideas.
  • Uses MLA format to attribute information and format the paper.
  • Shows evidence of revision by the writer.
  • Presents information using strategies for clarity and conciseness.
  • Uses appropriate conventions for academic written English.

You’ll receive comments on your first draft, and a grading rubric with your final draft that explains how your paper met the assignment guidelines. You can earn a maximum of 250 points for this paper. When you turn in your final version of the paper, you should also turn in your first draft and the peer review sheets you received. The peer review will be graded.

What will I learn during this project?

As you work through the components of this project, you will:

  1. Use writing for inquiry, learning, critical thinking, and communicating what you have learned from your research and to justify a position that you have taken.
  2. Respond appropriately to a rhetorical situation which asks you to conduct academic research and create two types academic writing.
  3. Demonstrate control of generic conventions for annotated bibliographies and argumentative academic essays including structure, development, paragraphing, tone, mechanics, and design.
  4. Demonstrate an understanding of writing as an open, collaborative, and social process and work through the stages of the writing process: invention, drafting, revising, and editing.
  5. Critique and edit your own work and the works of others.
  6. Develop a specific research question or focus to respond to a writing assignment.
  7. Identify a need for information and access, evaluate, use, and attribute primary and secondary sources in your work.
  8. Integrate the words and ideas of others into your work and avoid accidental or deliberate plagiarism.
  9. Write with clarity, brevity, coherence, and control of conventions such as syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
  10. Use technologies to conduct research and to draft, revise, edit, and design documents.

Download Printer-Friendly Version

Jump to: Topic || Research || Annotated Bibliography || Position Paper

What’s this project about?

You are in the process of committing a number of years of your life to learning about a particular discipline, such as Elementary Education, Accounting, Sports Management, Physics, History, or Biology. You may also have specific career plans for when you leave Niagara.

For this project, you will investigate, analyze and argue about a topic related to your major or future career which focuses on these questions:

  • How do people make knowledge in your field of study or in your career?
  • What happens when experts disagree? When and why do they disagree?
  • How do you sort through all of the evidence surrounding a controversial question or idea and decide what your position is?
  • How do you create a solid argument by using rhetorical appeals?
  • How do you respond to counter-arguments?

This assignment asks you to identify a controversial issue in your field, research multiple perspectives on this issue, and to decide which perspectives you agree and disagree with.

You’ll write an annotated bibliography (10 entries) and an position essay (8-10 pages) aimed at people outside of your field.

You will be expected to work both individually and in-groups to complete these assignments, as well as to complete multiple drafts and to show significant evidence of revision on the final versions. You will also be expected to pay attention to deadlines and to check the course Web site and the weekly agendas for the most current information about assignments, deadlines, and other vital information.

You may not “recycle” a paper or an annotated bibliography that you have written for another class for this assignment. If you wish to work on the same topic that you are pursuing in another class, that may be acceptable; please talk to both instructors and obtain their permission before you do so.

You can earn a total of 450 points for all of the assignments in this unit plus points for peer review activities; the amount of points for each component are available next to each component, as well as explained on each assignment sheet and on the course syllabus. Grading rubrics will be distributed with the final version of each project.

The Writing Center, in the Seton Presidential Lounge, offers free tutoring in writing; you are encouraged to visit them for additional help with your writing. You can make an appointment to see a tutor by calling 286-8075.

Choose A Topic and Form A Research Question

First, you’ll choose a topic and form a research question that you can use to help guide your research. Your topic should:

  • Be related to your major or career OR to a major or career that you want to explore.
  • Be about an issue in your field of study that has multiple perspectives or some controversy attached to it.
  • Be a topic on which you can locate academic, trade, and popular sources.

The topic cannot be a “generic issue” such as abortion, gun control, the death penalty, stem cell research, lowering the drinking age, legalizing drugs, or other common social issues, unless you can show exactly how these controversies are dealt with in your academic field. IT MUST BE A TOPIC ABOUT WHICH THERE IS DISAGREEMENT: YOU ARE WRITING A POSITION PAPER, NOT AN INFORMATIVE PAPER. Your topic should be as specific as possible, and you should be able to articulate clear research questions about it to help you look for sources and develop a thesis.

Here are some possible topics that would fit the assignment guidelines:

  • Should elementary school students be taught how to use computers, or does teaching computer skills at a young age actually hinder their learning? (Education)
  • What are the best strategies for dealing with prison overcrowding? (Criminal Justice)
  • Does building a casino in an area cause economic harm, or does it benefit the area? (Tourism Management)
  • Are electronic voting machines or paper ballots a better practice for elections in the United States? (Political Science)
  • Is outsourcing information technology jobs a positive or negative practice for businesses in the united states? (Business)
  • What are the best therapies for treating breast cancer? (Medicine)
  • Do cognitive behavior therapy or anti-depressants work better in treating depression? (Psychology/Medicine)
  • What really happened to the lost colonists of Roanoke Island? (History)

On October 23 and October 26, we’ll work on choosing topics and forming research questions. By October 28, you should e-mail the instructor (ekarper@niagara.edu) with a description of your chosen topic and your research question.

If after you have started researching, you discover that you need to change your topic because you cannot find sources, you must notify the instructor by e-mail or in person as soon as possible.

Conduct Research in the Library and Online

After you choose a topic and formulate a research question, we’ll discuss the creation of academic knowledge and how arguments work. After that, you will conduct research in the library and online on November 9 and November 11. During your research, you should locate at least ten (10) sources.

To encourage you to seek out a variety of sources and to practice working with different types of sources, I’m going to ask you to choose sources from different categories – you’ll notice that each category has sources in it that come from both print and the Web.

At least six (6) of your sources should be from the following categories:

  • Books or essay collections
  • Academic journal articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Trade journal articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Academic, educational, or professional Web resources

Four (4) of your sources can come from the following categories:

  • Interviews with experts in your field
  • Popular newspaper or magazine articles (from library databases, Web sites, or print journals)
  • Commercial Web sites
  • Specialized resources from your field, such as encyclopedias
  • Other sources (please check with the instructor)

You can use encyclopedias such as Wikipedia or textbooks from your major courses as a reference for identifying controversial questions and perspectives, but you cannot use them as sources in the assignment because they do not provide enough depth and breadth. However, you can look up and use the references they cite as part of your research.

Make sure that you give yourself enough time to locate sources. Also make sure that you consult with the instructor or with a librarian if you are having trouble locating ten sources.

Write an Annotated Bibliography

After you have located research on your topic, you will write an annotated bibliography where you annotate at least ten (10) sources and summarize, assess, and reflect on each source.

To complete the assignment, you should:

  • Write ONE introductory paragraph for the annotated bibliography that presents your research question and explains what you’ve discovered in your research. (You do not need to write an introductory paragraph for each citation.)
  • Create a citation for each source as if you were going to cite it in a works cited list. Alphabetize your citations (and their annotations) as if they were in a works cited list.
  • Under each citation, write two paragraphs for each source where you:
    • Summarize the source’s content: What are the main points being conveyed?
    • Assess the source’s credibility and importance: Why is this a reasonable and useful source for your project?
    • Reflect on why this is a relevant source for your project: Why is it important that you use this information in your project instead of some other source? (You can talk about how this isn’t a good source for your project if you don’t think it will be useful.)
  • If you quote directly from any source in your annotation, attribute the quotations using MLA style conventions.
  • Write with care and attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

You only have to write two paragraphs for each source; however, you must make sure that you summarize, assess, and reflect on the source in each annotation. See the sample annotated bibliography in the printer-friendly version for an example of what the project should look like.

Grading Criteria

This project will be graded on the following criteria:

  • How well you use MLA style to create a citation for each source.
  • How well you summarize, assess, and reflect on each source.
  • How well you use appropriate conventions for written English (grammar, spelling, punctuation, style and tone).

The first draft of the annotated bibliography is due on November 15; The final draft is due on November 20. You can earn a maximum of 200 points for the annotated bibliography.

Write A Position Paper

You’ll use the sources that you’ve collected and presented in your annotated bibliography to help you write a long academic essay where you take a position on the issue and use your research and your own ideas and opinions to explain and argue for your position.

Specifics

In the essay, you should:

  • Describe the issue you have chosen to research.
  • Describe the different positions which people in your field have on this topic using research and your own knowledge.
  • Provide a clear and explicit thesis statement which explains your position and your reasons why this position is the best choice.
  • Develop an argument for your position with reasons and evidence from outside sources as well as your own opinions.
  • Use at least ten (10) sources of information in your paper. These sources should include some of the sources from your annotated bibliography.
  • Connect your ideas using transition words and phrases.
  • Write in an academic style. (You can use first person, but your language should be precise, concise, and more formal than other types of writing.)
  • Create sentences that are precise, concise, and correct.
  • Show evidence of revision in your final draft.
  • Pay attention to English conventions for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Formatting

The essay should:

  • Have a heading on the first page with your name, your section, and the date. (A title page is not necessary.)
  • Have a title that is centered on the first page under the heading.
  • Contain page numbers on all pages but the first.
  • Be 8-10 pages long (double-spaced; twelve-point font), including your works cited list.
  • Use MLA style to give credit to sources by providing in-text citations, attributive tags, and a works cited list.

We’ll work together in class to help you develop all parts of your paper. You’ll also have an opportunity to give and receive feedback with your classmates on your first draft, as well as receiving comments from the instructor.

The first draft of the essay is due on November 30; the final draft of the essay is due on December 11.

Grading Criteria

This paper will be graded based on how well it:

  • Describes the issue and explains the different perspectives.
  • Takes a clear position and justifies the this position.
  • Presents a specific thesis statement with a claim and reasons and has a clear focus.
  • Presents and incorporates information, including using the works of others and the opinions and experience of the writer.
  • Includes the minimum of ten sources.
  • Organizes and presents information, including making transitions and connections between ideas.
  • Uses MLA format to attribute information and format the paper.
  • Shows evidence of revision by the writer.
  • Presents information using strategies for clarity and conciseness.
  • Uses appropriate conventions for academic written English.

You’ll receive comments on your first draft, and a grading rubric with your final draft that explains how your paper met the assignment guidelines. You can earn a maximum of 250 points for this paper. When you turn in your final version of the paper, you should also turn in your first draft and the peer review sheets you received. The peer review will be graded.

What will I learn during this project?

As you work through the components of this project, you will:

  1. Use writing for inquiry, learning, critical thinking, and communicating what you have learned from your research and to justify a position that you have taken.
  2. Respond appropriately to a rhetorical situation which asks you to conduct academic research and create two types academic writing.
  3. Demonstrate control of generic conventions for annotated bibliographies and argumentative academic essays including structure, development, paragraphing, tone, mechanics, and design.
  4. Demonstrate an understanding of writing as an open, collaborative, and social process and work through the stages of the writing process: invention, drafting, revising, and editing.
  5. Critique and edit your own work and the works of others.
  6. Develop a specific research question or focus to respond to a writing assignment.
  7. Identify a need for information and access, evaluate, use, and attribute primary and secondary sources in your work.
  8. Integrate the words and ideas of others into your work and avoid accidental or deliberate plagiarism.
  9. Write with clarity, brevity, coherence, and control of conventions such as syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
  10. Use technologies to conduct research and to draft, revise, edit, and design documents.
Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for October 5-9

Monday, October 5

Today you’ll turn in your short discussion papers. We’ll finalize topics for the analysis paper and start generating ideas for what you need to know about your urban legend and how you might find that out through research.

Assignments for Next Class
Read pp. 375-384 in Norton Field Guide and use that information to help you write your RESEARCH PLAN.

Wednesday, October 7

We’ll discuss strategies for locating sources about your urban legend and strategies for recording and citing information as you do research. Questions you asked about citations will be answered.

Assignments For Next Class
Locate sources for your draft; bring AT LEAST ONE SOURCE TO CLASS.
BRING YOUR BOOK TO CLASS.

Friday, October 9

Today we’ll discuss and practice evaluating sources for credibility, usefulness, and appropriateness to a rhetorical situation. Then we’ll discuss developing a focus for your analysis papers and practice generating claims and reasons statements.

Assignments For Next Class
FIRST DRAFT DUE; BRING THREE COPIES TO CLASS AFTER BREAK.

Printable Version Printable Version

Busting a Myth: Assignment Guidelines

Download Printer-Friendly Version

Jump to: Discussion Paper || Topic || Research Plan || Analysis Paper

What does it mean to be information literate? Should you believe everything you read on the Internet? What about everything you hear from the experts? In an age bursting with information, it can be difficult to figure out what’s true, what’s false, and what’s in-between. This assignment asks you to analyze and assess an urban legend and to engage in informative and analytical writing.


Short Discussion Paper

Content
As a class, we’ll read and watch some contemporary legends and some analyses of them and write a short (1-2 page) paper which discusses how people research and analyze urban legends.

Your paper should:

  • Explain at least two ways how people investigate the veracity of urban legends and analyze why people tell them to others.
  • Provide specific examples to develop your discussion and support your ideas.
  • Refer to at least two of the articles, Web pages, or TV show clips that you have read or watched in or outside of class.
  • Give credit to the works of others in your text using a citation system. (You may use any citation system that you know and are comfortable with.)
  • Use appropriate conventions for academic writing, including creating paragraphs with one main idea, taking a more formal tone than writing an email or a text message, and paying attention to spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Format
Your paper should:

  • Have your name, section, and date in the upper left hand corner
  • Be two pages long.
  • Be double-spaced in 10 or 12 point font.

YOUR SHORT DISCUSSION PAPER WILL BE DUE ON MONDAY OCTOBER 5.

Grading
You can earn a maximum of 25 points for this paper. Your paper will be graded based on how well it:

  • Explains how people investigate and analyze urban legends, including providing specific examples and citing the research we have read and discussed in and outside of class. (15 points)
  • Uses and cites the works of others in your text (5 points)
  • Uses appropriate conventions for academic writing (5 points)

The instructor will provide a rubric when she returns your paper which explains the number of points you scored.

Choosing A Topic

Next, you’ll choose a specific urban legend to analyze. The urban legend needs to meet the definition of an urban legend that we discussed in class: it’s believed and told as true, and it has moral or social implications. Most conspiracy theories (like a second shooter on the grassy knoll or a faked moon landing) and cryptozoology (like the Loch Ness monster or the chupacabra) are not appropriate topics. If you’re not sure about a topic, the “Bust a Myth” links section on the course Web site provides links to various sites that collect urban legends.

You will be expected to do the following with your chosen topic:

  • collect examples and variations of your urban legend
  • research and prove whether the urban legend is true, false, or indeterminate
  • research the urban legend’s origin and causes for why people believe in it and pass it along

E-MAIL A SHORT DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CHOSEN URBAN LEGEND TO THE INSTRUCTOR BY MONDAY OCTOBER 5. It won’t be graded, but the instructor will respond with some brief feedback about your topic.


Research Plan

We’ll talk about what you might need to find out in order to investigate and analyze your urban legend, and you’ll create and submit a research plan which explains what information you think you’ll need and where you’ll look for it.

Content
Your research plan will:

  • Provide a brief summary of your urban legend.
  • Explain what you need to find out and how you will find it:
    • Where will you find specimens of your urban legend?
    • How are you going to determine whether or not your urban legend is true, false, or indeterminate?
    • Where will you find information about where the urban legend came from, why people believe it, or why people circulate it?
  • Ask any questions related to researching or understanding your topic.
  • Use appropriate conventions for academic writing, including creating paragraphs with one main idea, taking a more formal tone than writing an email or a text message, and paying attention to spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Format
Your research plan will:

  • Have your name, section, and date in the upper left hand corner
  • Be between one and two pages long.
  • Be double-spaced in 10 or 12 point font.

YOUR RESEARCH PLAN WILL BE DUE ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 7.

Grading
You can earn a maximum of 25 points for your research plan. It will be graded based on how well it:

  • Summarizes your urban legend (5 points)
  • Explains where you will look find information about all three aspects of your urban legend. (15 points)
  • Uses appropriate conventions for academic writing (5 points)

The instructor will provide a rubric when she returns your paper which explains the number of points you scored.


Analysis Paper

Next, you’ll use the information you collected and your own ideas to write an academic paper about your urban legend. You will write multiple drafts of this paper, receive comments on your draft from your classmates and your instructor, and revise and edit your work.

Content
Your analysis paper will:

  • Present your urban legend (including variations) and discuss where it originated

  • Take a position on whether the urban legend is true, false, or indeterminate and provide evidence to support your position.
  • Analyze and speculate about why people believe in and circulate this urban legend to others.
  • Have a well-organized introduction, body, and conclusion which present your ideas.
  • Contain a clear thesis statement that tells the reader what to expect in the paper.
  • Cite the works of others to support your arguments using attributive tags and parenthetical citations in MLA format.
  • Provide a works cited list in MLA format for the works that you cite in your paper
  • Use appropriate conventions for academic writing, including creating paragraphs with one main idea, taking a more formal tone than writing an email or a text message, and paying attention to spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
  • Have a first draft which will receive written comments from your instructor and your peers.
  • Have a final draft in which you revise your writing based on feedback and edit your writing to make it more clear, concise, and correct.

Format
The final draft of your analysis paper will:

  • Have your name, section, and date in the upper left hand corner
  • Be between five and seven pages long.
  • Be double-spaced in 10 or 12 point font
  • Have page numbers in the upper right hand corner of each page.
  • Include all previous drafts and peer review sheets (attached with a paper clip).

THE FIRST DRAFT OF YOUR PAPER WILL BE DUE ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 14. THE FINAL DRAFT OF YOUR PAPER WILL BE DUE ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23.

Grading
Your first draft will not be graded, but the peer review activities you produce for your peers that they turn in with their final drafts will be graded. Your final draft will be graded and is worth 200 points.

Your paper will be graded based on how well it:

  • Presents, takes a position on, and analyzes your urban legend (50 points).
  • Provides a clear thesis statement and develops and organizes information (50 points).
  • Attributes information using parenthetical citations, attributive tags, and a works cited list in MLA format (40 points).
  • Uses appropriate style, tone, and formatting for an academic paper (20 points).
  • Uses appropriate conventions of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage (40 points).

Learning Outcomes Covered in This Sequence

These assigments will help you learn how to:

  1. Use writing for inquiry, learning, critical thinking, communicating, and engaging with the world through the different types of writing that you will do for each assigment.

  2. Respond appropriately to different kinds of rhetorical situations and to the needs of different audiences by giving you a chance to write in a variety of rhetorical situations.
  3. Demonstrate control of generic conventions such as structure, development, paragraphing, tone, mechanics, and design by giving you a chance to analyze, discuss, and produce different types of writing.
  4. Demonstrate an understanding of writing as an open, collaborative, and social process and work through the stages of the writing process: invention, drafting, revising, and editing.
  5. Critique and edit your own work and the works of others through peer review activities.
  6. Develop a specific research question or focus to respond to a writing assignment through class discussion and through the thesis statement you include in your analysis paper.
  7. Identify a need for information and access, evaluate, use, and attribute primary and secondary sources via class discussion and activities as well as the content of your short discussion paper and analysis paper.
  8. Integrate the words and ideas of others into your work and avoid accidental or deliberate plagiarism via class discussion and activities as well as the content of your short discussion paper and analysis paper.
  9. Write with clarity, brevity, coherence, and control of conventions such as syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling in the written work that you produce.
  10. Use technologies to conduct research and to draft, revise, edit, and design documents.
Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for September 28-October 2

Monday, September 28

Today you’ll turn in your literacy narratives. We’ll then go over the guidelines for the next assignment sequence (Busting a Myth) and begin talking about how people analyze and discuss urban legends.

Assignments For Next Class
Read “What Are Urban Legends?”, “Preface,” (Brunvand) and “Introduction” (Craughwell) (Given out in class.)

Wednesday, September 30

Today we’ll continue our investigation into urban legends by discussing how people define urban legends.

Assignments For Next Class
Read “Curses! Broiled Again!” and “Brown Betty.” (Given out in class.)

Friday, October 3

Today we’ll continue our investigation into urban legends by discussing how three investigators approached the same urban legend.

Assignments for Next Class
SHORT DISCUSSION PAPER DUE.
Read pp. 49-58 in Norton Field Guide.
Email instructor with topic for analysis paper.

Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for September 21-25

Monday, September 21

Today you’ll meet in peer review groups to discuss comments on your draft. We’ll also discuss and practice specific revision strategies.
Assignments for Next Class
Attend conference on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday.
Work on revising literacy narrative; final draft due on Monday, September 28.

Wednesday, September 23 and Friday, September 25

Instructor conferences: NO CLASS.

Assignments for Next Class
FINAL DRAFT OF LITERACY NARRATIVE DUE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28.

Printable Version Printable Version

Weekly Agenda for September 14-September 18

Monday, September 14

We’ll work on descriptive writing strategies to help you with your literacy narratives.

Assignments For Next Class
Read Chapter 39 in Norton Field Guide to Writing.

Wednesday, September 16

Today we’ll discuss and practice additional writing strategies for your literacy narratives.

Assignments For Next Class
FIRST DRAFT OF LITERACY NARRATIVE DUE: BRING THREE COPIES TO CLASS.

Friday, September 18

Today we’ll discuss and practice strategies for peer review.

Assignment For Next Class
Complete peer review sheets; bring them to class.

Printable Version Printable Version

Literacy Narrative: Assignment Guidelines

Printer-Friendly Version (PDF)

In today’s world, literacy means more than reading and writing; it also means being able to use information and work with technologies. What does it mean to be literate in the information age? How has literacy shaped your life? How have your literate practices changed throughout the course of your life?

This assignment asks you to tell a 4-6 page story (narrative) about a moment in your life where literacy – of any kind, including “regular” literacy, information literacy or technological literacy — was important. You could write about…

  • a moment when you learned an literacy skill (such as learning to read, searching for information to write your first research paper, or learning how to use a computer to play Oregon Trail in the third grade).

  • a time when you succeeded or failed in life due to your literacy skills (such as a love of reading helping you to score high on the SATs, getting a bad grade on a research paper due to poor information literacy skills, or getting a job testing video games because of your mad tech skills).

Content

Your paper should:

  • Provide a well-told story about a specific moment in your life when literacy was important.

  • Use vivid details to give the reader an impression of the scene.
  • Give some indication of the narrative’s significance: show the reader what this story demonstrates about your literate practices.
  • Use appropriate conventions for writing a narrative, including creating paragraphs with one main idea, taking a more formal tone than writing an email or a text message, and paying attention to spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

For more information and help with content, see “Writing A Literacy Narrative” in The Norton Field Guide to Writing as well as the links in the Write A Literacy Narrative” section on this Web site.

Format

The final draft of your paper should:

  • Have your name, section (WRT 100B, WRT 100E, or WRT 100I), and date in the upper left hand corner

  • Be double-spaced in 10 or 12 point serif font (such as Times New Roman).
  • Be between four (4) and six (6) pages.
  • Include the peer review sheets given to you by your group members with the final draft.

FIRST DRAFT DUE: FFRIDAY SEPTEMBER 18
FINAL DRAFT DUE: MONDAY SEPTEMBER 28

Grading

You can earn a maximum of 200 points for this paper. Your paper will be graded based on how well it:

  • Narrates a clear and well-told story about literacy (75 points)

  • Provides vivid detail for the reader and a sense of the significance of the moment (75 points)
  • Uses appropriate conventions for narrative writing (50 points)

The instructor will provide a rubric when she returns your paper which explains the number of points you scored.

Connections to Course Goals
This assignment will help you learn how to:

  1. Use writing for inquiry, learning, critical thinking, communicating, and engaging with the world through the creation of a literacy narrative.

  2. Respond appropriately to different kinds of rhetorical situations and to the needs of different audiences by giving you a chance to write in a specific rhetorical situation.
  3. Demonstrate control of generic conventions such as structure, development, paragraphing, tone, mechanics, and design by giving you a chance to analyze, discuss, and produce a specific genre of writing (literacy narrative).
  4. Demonstrate an understanding of writing as an open, collaborative, and social process and work through the stages of the writing process: invention, drafting, revising, and editing.
  5. Critique and edit your own work and the works of others through peer review activities.
  6. Develop a specific research question or focus to respond to a writing assignment through class discussion and through the focus of your literacy narrative.
  7. Write with clarity, brevity, coherence, and control of conventions such as syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling in the written work that you produce.
  8. Use technologies to conduct research and to draft, revise, edit, and design documents.
Printable Version Printable Version

« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »